amoeba opened a new issue, #41162:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/41162

   ### Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, 
version, and platform.
   
   When you call `.to_pandas()` on a timestamp array, you get timezone-aware 
values. When you call `.to_pandas()` on a nested timestamp array, you get 
timezone-naive values. For example:
   
   ```python
   import pandas as pd
   import pyarrow as pa
   
   ts = pandas.Timestamp('2024-01-01 12:00:00+0000', tz = 'Europe/Paris')
   
   # unnested, we get a timezone-aware result
   pa.Array.from_pandas([myts]).to_pandas()[0]
   # => Timestamp('2024-01-01 13:00:00+0100', tz='Europe/Paris')
   
   # nested, we get a timezone-naive result
   pa.Array.from_pandas([[myts]]).to_pandas()[0][0]
   # => numpy.datetime64('2024-01-01T12:00:00.000000')
   ```
   
   While the values appear correct (which is good), the unnested case is 
timezone-aware while the nested case is timezone-naive. This difference may be 
surprising to users and would require extra steps on their part to re-construct 
a timezone-aware result if that was their goal.
   
   Another difference I notice in the above output is that the unnested version 
is returned as a pandas `Timestamp` while the nested version is returned as 
numpy `datetime64`. It's my understanding that numpy's datetimes aren't 
timezone-aware 
([ref](https://numpy.org/devdocs/reference/arrays.datetime.html)) so it seems 
possible PyArrow is inheriting that behavior. The pandas docs [point to the 
arrays.DatetimeArray 
extensiontype](https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.25.0/reference/arrays.html#datetime-data)
 which I don't think PyArrow is making use of.
   
   Is it possible to have a consistent result with respect to 
timezone-awareness in this case?
   
   ### Component(s)
   
   Python


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to