asfimport opened a new issue, #17211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/17211

   The purpose of this function is to compute 32- or 64-bit hash values for 
each cell in an Array. Hashes for nested types can be computed recursively by 
combining the hash values of their children
   
   **Reporter**: [Wes 
McKinney](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8991) / @wesm
   **Assignee**: [Aldrin 
Montana](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8991) / @drin
   #### Subtasks:
   - [X] [[C++][Compute] Add FastHash32 as a 32-bit version of a scalar hash 
function](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32264)
   #### Related issues:
   - [[C++] Implement hashing, dictionary-encoding for 
StructArray](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/20581) (is a child of)
   - [[C++] Add a compute function to hash 
inputs](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31876) (is duplicated by)
   - [[C++] Benchmark key_hash and document tradeoffs with vendored 
xxhash](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31439) (is related to)
   - [[C++] Support joining tables with non-key fields as 
list](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32504) (is related to)
   - [[C++] Unify KeyColumnArray and 
ArraySpan](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32540) (is related to)
   - [[C++][Compute] Add Cryptographic hash functions to 
Acero](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/20362) (is related to)
   #### PRs and other links:
   - [GitHub Pull Request #13487](https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13487)
   
   <sub>**Note**: *This issue was originally created as 
[ARROW-8991](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8991). Please see the 
[migration documentation](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542) for 
further details.*</sub>


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to