[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15009583#comment-15009583
]
Jake Farrell commented on AURORA-1477:
--------------------------------------
I've got an updated rpm spec for this to unify the names on aurora-scheduler,
aurora-executor and aurora-tools
Tested on centos-7 with resulting packages
{code}
Wrote:
/root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/aurora-scheduler-0.9.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
Wrote:
/root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/aurora-tools-0.9.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
Wrote:
/root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/aurora-executor-0.9.0-1.el7.centos.aurora.x86_64.rpm
{code}
before I submit the patch for review wanted to get consensus for these as the
names moving forward, thoughts?
> Unify RPM and DEB package names
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: AURORA-1477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1477
> Project: Aurora
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Packaging
> Reporter: Kevin Sweeney
> Assignee: Jake Farrell
> Priority: Blocker
>
> As mentioned on-list I think it will cause long-term confusion to use
> different names for packages across formats. Rename packages to use a single
> unified convention.
> Marking this as blocker as it is very difficult to take back once official
> packages are released.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
