[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15086335#comment-15086335
]
zane silver commented on AURORA-1572:
-------------------------------------
The case I'm concerned about is when cmd0 finishes, but now one of cmd1 - cmdn
is running. It won't receive the SIGTERM.
I agree that the parent process should be responsible for managing the child
process. But here it seems that commands cmd1 - cmdn are treated as children of
cmd0.
> SIGTERM is not sent to child processes
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: AURORA-1572
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1572
> Project: Aurora
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: Executor
> Reporter: zane silver
> Assignee: Bill Farner
> Priority: Trivial
>
> In terminate_process, SIGTERM is sent to the parent process only. This seems
> like a deliberate design choice given that the kill_process does send a
> SIGKILL to each child process. Is there a reason why SIGTERM is not also sent
> the to child processes?
> For reference, I'm referring to the functions defined in the thermos
> helper.py file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
