[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223330#comment-15223330
 ] 

Stephan Erb commented on AURORA-1149:
-------------------------------------

Given that nobody seems to have a problem with retrying [1], can we close this 
issue?

[1]https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/9ed81a7db58f6a7cb308c8ac6a545705351c8c0e/src/main/java/org/apache/aurora/scheduler/base/Conversions.java#L60
 

> Decide the appropriate way to handle TASK_ERROR
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1149
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1149
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Story
>          Components: Scheduler, Usability
>            Reporter: Bill Farner
>
> This may mean the state machine needs to accommodate this state.  The outcome 
> should depend on whether we believe TASK_ERROR is truly permanently fatal, or 
> whether it could represent a transient configuration error in some component 
> (e.g. scheduler, master).  If we believe TASK_ERROR is indeed always fatal, 
> this should be a terminal and non-reschedulable state regardless of whether 
> the task is a service.  However, if it can be transient, we may still want to 
> try to revive the task to avoid temporary configuration errors from tearing 
> down services.
> Personally, i'm leaning towards the retry case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to