Benjamin Staffin created AURORA-1746:
----------------------------------------
Summary: Shiro authorization errors could be friendlier
Key: AURORA-1746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1746
Project: Aurora
Issue Type: Story
Components: Scheduler
Reporter: Benjamin Staffin
Priority: Minor
When the scheduler is configured to use Kerberos auth with shiro, the error
messages it returns to clients are not as informative as they could be. For
example:
{code}
Subject org.apache.shiro.web.subject.support.WebDelegatingSubject@585fe96c is
not permitted to JobScopedRpcPermission{rpc=startJobUpdate,
permittedJob=IJobKey{role=foo, environment=devel, name=fancyjob}}
{code}
It would be very nice if the message masked the
{{org.apache.shiro.web.subject[...]}} class name and either (a) listed the
actual subject/principal name of the client ({{[email protected]}}), or (b)
generically referred to "the client".
I would also suggest using the term "authorized" rather than "permitted". This
is probably debatable, and the semantic difference is minimal, but to me the
former more directly hints at a thing that can be configured, whereas the
current message might be misinterpreted to mean something that cannot be done
at all.
For bonus points, also rewrite the {{JobScopedRpcPermission}} part of the
message to be friendlier. That part at least includes enough details that an
informed user could figure out what it means after staring at it a bit.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
