[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15421467#comment-15421467
 ] 

Joshua Cohen commented on AURORA-1711:
--------------------------------------

Ok, that sounds reasonable enough to me. Especially if we extend the 
{{StartJobUpdateResult}} to make it possible to avoid the query entirely.

> Allow client to store metadata on Update entity
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1711
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1711
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: David McLaughlin
>
> I have a use case where I'm programmatically starting updates via the Aurora 
> API and sometimes the request to the scheduler times out or fails, even 
> though the update is written to storage and started. 
> I'd like to be able to store some unique identifier on the update so that we 
> can reconcile this state later. We can make this generic by allowing clients 
> to store arbitrary metadata on an update (similar to how they do it with job 
> configuration). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to