[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15472258#comment-15472258
]
Zameer Manji commented on AURORA-1766:
--------------------------------------
I think [~StephanErb] is in favor of removing it. Maybe he can share his view
on how to fix this. Maybe we should just have "minimum job size"?
> Account for thermos executor overhead in reported CPU usage to user
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AURORA-1766
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1766
> Project: Aurora
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: Scheduler
> Reporter: Rick Mangi
>
> The default .25 CPU overhead taken for thermos can be hugely impactful on
> clusters with many tasks and it's not reported to the user in the web UI.
> Ideally the resources used by the cluster should be reported accurately. We
> ran into a case where we could not launch jobs even though we thought we had
> plenty of free cores.
> Alternatively, the thermos overhead could be removed completely. I think it's
> confusing personally.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
