[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Lambert reassigned AURORA-175:
------------------------------------
Assignee: brian wickman
> thermos runner should discriminate failures using exit status
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AURORA-175
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-175
> Project: Aurora
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Executor, Thermos
> Reporter: brian wickman
> Assignee: brian wickman
> Priority: Critical
>
> We do the correct thing on the executor side when there is a
> configuration/interpolation problem (report FAILURE.)
> On the thermos_runner side, we don't exit with a separate exit status for bad
> configuration, nor do we even pay attention to the exit status from the
> thermos executor. So when the runner exits unexpectedly, that's always
> treated as a LOST. Instead there should be a contract between the
> thermos_runner and thermos_executor about certain classes of failures
> indicated by exit statuses so that we can differentiate between legit LOST
> and FAILURE, for example if the user no longer exists on the box.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
