[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14174249#comment-14174249
]
Zameer Manji commented on AURORA-858:
-------------------------------------
>From my understanding we currently use 'reservations' to describe the
>resources the user requests. If we rename quota then we need to call the
>resources the user requests something else. I propose 'allocated resources' or
>similar.
> rename quota
> ------------
>
> Key: AURORA-858
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-858
> Project: Aurora
> Issue Type: Story
> Reporter: Jay Buffington
>
> I find the term "quota" misleading. New users assume it is a high watermark,
> when in fact it is a guarantee of resources.
> I discussed this with [~wfarner] a bit, he suggested perhaps "reservations"
> would better communicate the concept.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
