[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5866?focusedWorklogId=159740&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-159740
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-5866:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 28/Oct/18 18:49
            Start Date: 28/Oct/18 18:49
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: kanterov commented on issue #6845: [BEAM-5866] Fix 
`Row#equals`
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6845#issuecomment-433731101
 
 
   @reuvenlax Yes, the problem with ByteBuffer that it has too many fields we 
don't need, like `positions`, `limit`, `offset`, `mark`, `capacity`, 
`isReadonly`. They make sense when implementing protocols, but aren't so much 
useful in data pipelines.
   
   @kennknowles do we even want hashmap as implementation? In Spark, it's done 
with ArrayBasedMaps. I was thinking similar could be done, for instance, for 
arrays, to use primitive non-boxing collections where applicable.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 159740)
    Time Spent: 4h 20m  (was: 4h 10m)

> RowCoder doesn't implement structuralValue
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-5866
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5866
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Gleb Kanterov
>            Assignee: Gleb Kanterov
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 4h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> These two properties fail for RowCoder with `BYTES` field, or `Map<BYTES, ?>` 
> field. 
> {code}
>   public static <T> void testConsistentWithEquals(Coder<T> coder, T example) {
>     assumeTrue(coder.consistentWithEquals());
>     byte[] bytes = encodeBytes(coder, example);
>     // even if the coder is non-deterministic, if the encoded bytes match,
>     // coder is consistent with equals, decoded values must be equal
>     T out0 = decodeBytes(coder, bytes);
>     T out1 = decodeBytes(coder, bytes);
>     assertEquals("If the encoded bytes match, decoded values must be equal", 
> out0, out1);
>     assertEquals(
>         "If two values are equal, their hash codes must be equal",
>         out0.hashCode(),
>         out1.hashCode());
>   }
>   public static <T> void testStructuralValueConsistentWithEquals(Coder<T> 
> coder, T example) {
>     byte[] bytes = encodeBytes(coder, example);
>     // even if coder is non-deterministic, if the encoded bytes match,
>     // structural values must be equal
>     Object out0 = coder.structuralValue(decodeBytes(coder, bytes));
>     Object out1 = coder.structuralValue(decodeBytes(coder, bytes));
>     assertEquals("If the encoded bytes match, structural values must be 
> equal", out0, out1);
>     assertEquals(
>         "If two values are equal, their hash codes must be equal",
>         out0.hashCode(),
>         out1.hashCode());
>   }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to