[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17165062#comment-17165062
 ] 

Beam JIRA Bot commented on BEAM-9748:
-------------------------------------

This issue is assigned but has not received an update in 30 days so it has been 
labeled "stale-assigned". If you are still working on the issue, please give an 
update and remove the label. If you are no longer working on the issue, please 
unassign so someone else may work on it. In 7 days the issue will be 
automatically unassigned.

> Refactor Reparallelize as an alternative Reshuffle implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9748
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9748
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Ismaël Mejía
>            Assignee: Ismaël Mejía
>            Priority: P3
>              Labels: stale-assigned
>          Time Spent: 4h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Some DoFn based IOs like JdbcIO and RedisIO rely on a different approach to 
> Reparallelize outputs using a combination of a an empty PCollectionView to 
> force materialization and Reshuffle.viaRandomkey to reparallelize a 
> PCollection. This issue extracts this transform and expose it as part of the 
> Reshuffle to avoid repeating the code for transforms (notably IOs) that 
> produce lots of sequentially generated data where and benefit of this 
> alternative approach to perform better reparallelization of its output.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to