[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9910?focusedWorklogId=464235&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-464235
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9910:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 29/Jul/20 17:51
            Start Date: 29/Jul/20 17:51
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: chamikaramj commented on pull request #12255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/12255#issuecomment-665768931


   @allenpradeep given that this seems to be a per-element change, have we done 
a performance analysis to confirm that there's won't be a significant 
performance degradation due to this ?
   
   LGTM other than that.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 464235)
    Time Spent: 0.5h  (was: 20m)

> Add byte counters to SpannerIO.write
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9910
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io-java-gcp
>            Reporter: Allen Pradeep Xavier
>            Assignee: Allen Pradeep Xavier
>            Priority: P3
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently SpannerIO has counters that count the number of mutationgroups 
> written and the number successful writes to spanner.
> A common customer complaint regarding Spanner import is the lack of job 
> progress information and a byte counter which shows the successful bytes 
> written to spanner would help alleviate some customer pain.
>  
> cc [~nielm]
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to