[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17179944#comment-17179944
]
Beam JIRA Bot commented on BEAM-676:
------------------------------------
This issue is P2 but has been unassigned without any comment for 60 days so it
has been labeled "stale-P2". If this issue is still affecting you, we care!
Please comment and remove the label. Otherwise, in 14 days the issue will be
moved to P3.
Please see https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/ for a detailed
explanation of what these priorities mean.
> Use a provider to create JMS ConnectionFactory and avoid Serialization issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-jms
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: P2
> Labels: stale-P2
>
> The {{JmsIO}} uses JMS {{ConnectionFactory}} as configuration. Unfortunately,
> {{ConnectionFactory}} interface doesn't extend {{Serializable}} (even if most
> of the implementations are {{Serializable}}).
> Instead (as I'm doing for the {{JdbcIO}}), I propose to create a
> {{ConnectionFactoryConfiguration}} POJO to create the {{ConnectionFactory}}
> in the {{@Setup}} of the reader and writer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
