[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17189548#comment-17189548
]
Beam JIRA Bot commented on BEAM-676:
------------------------------------
This issue was marked "stale-P2" and has not received a public comment in 14
days. It is now automatically moved to P3. If you are still affected by it, you
can comment and move it back to P2.
> Use a provider to create JMS ConnectionFactory and avoid Serialization issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-jms
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: P3
>
> The {{JmsIO}} uses JMS {{ConnectionFactory}} as configuration. Unfortunately,
> {{ConnectionFactory}} interface doesn't extend {{Serializable}} (even if most
> of the implementations are {{Serializable}}).
> Instead (as I'm doing for the {{JdbcIO}}), I propose to create a
> {{ConnectionFactoryConfiguration}} POJO to create the {{ConnectionFactory}}
> in the {{@Setup}} of the reader and writer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
