[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17212517#comment-17212517
]
Beam JIRA Bot commented on BEAM-10692:
--------------------------------------
This issue is P2 but has been unassigned without any comment for 60 days so it
has been labeled "stale-P2". If this issue is still affecting you, we care!
Please comment and remove the label. Otherwise, in 14 days the issue will be
moved to P3.
Please see https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/ for a detailed
explanation of what these priorities mean.
> Change org.apache.beam.sdk.extensions.ml.CloudVision to associate the
> AnnotateImageResponses with the image data used for the annotation
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-10692
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10692
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: extensions-java-gcp
> Affects Versions: 2.22.0
> Reporter: Sergei Lilichenko
> Priority: P2
> Labels: stale-P2
>
> There is a problem with the design of that transform. It takes a
> PCollection<String> (in case of GCS URIs) in and outputs
> PCollection<List<AnnotateImageResponse>>. There is no way to associate the
> responses with the original file URIs.
> [ImageAnnotationContext|https://cloud.google.com/vision/docs/reference/rest/v1/AnnotateImageResponse#ImageAnnotationContext]
> is returned as part of the response, but the "uri" is empty for the majority
> of annotations (looks like it's only populated for file annotations and not
> for image annotations).
> One approach is to return KV<String, List<AnnotateImageResponse>> for images
> where the key is the GCS URI and for bytes to pass an id of any type and do
> KV<IDTYPE, List<AnnotateImageResponse>>.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
