[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11271?focusedWorklogId=579403&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-579403
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-11271:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 08/Apr/21 17:54
Start Date: 08/Apr/21 17:54
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: pabloem commented on pull request #14395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14395#issuecomment-816022205
@kmjung - we've received feedback that using Datastet location instead of
table location would be better because privilege requirements are lower. Do you
know if this is correct? Also, do you know if API quota is any differnt for
these two options?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 579403)
Time Spent: 40m (was: 0.5h)
> Update BigQuery source to perform datasets.get instead of tables.get to
> determine location
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-11271
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11271
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-gcp
> Reporter: Chamikara Madhusanka Jayalath
> Priority: P3
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For Java we have to update referencedTables.get(0) call in following location:
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/release-2.26.0/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/BigQueryQueryHelper.java#L111
>
> Based on user feedback, seems like datasets.get is preferable to tables.get
> due to not requiring access to table metadata.
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
