[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11271?focusedWorklogId=593052&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-593052
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-11271:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 06/May/21 22:49
Start Date: 06/May/21 22:49
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: aaltay commented on pull request #14395:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14395#issuecomment-833925447
Should we close this PR if there is no material difference between the two
APIs?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 593052)
Time Spent: 1h 10m (was: 1h)
> Update BigQuery source to perform datasets.get instead of tables.get to
> determine location
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-11271
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11271
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-gcp
> Reporter: Chamikara Madhusanka Jayalath
> Priority: P3
> Time Spent: 1h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For Java we have to update referencedTables.get(0) call in following location:
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/release-2.26.0/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/BigQueryQueryHelper.java#L111
>
> Based on user feedback, seems like datasets.get is preferable to tables.get
> due to not requiring access to table metadata.
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
