[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11994?focusedWorklogId=596920&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-596920
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-11994:
-----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 14/May/21 21:20
Start Date: 14/May/21 21:20
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: robertwb commented on pull request #14804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14804#issuecomment-841509518
Thanks for clarifying the motivation.
I don't think it makes sense to add complexity to Beam metrics to work
around a bug in OpenCensus. Instead, whatever code is reporting to OpenCensus
should have the hack to assign a reasonable start time value the first time it
reports a metric.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 596920)
Time Spent: 12h (was: 11h 50m)
> Java BigQuery - Implement IO Request Count metrics
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-11994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11994
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: io-java-gcp
> Reporter: Alex Amato
> Assignee: Alex Amato
> Priority: P2
> Time Spent: 12h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Reference PRs (See BigQuery IO example) and detailed explanation of what's
> needed to instrument this IO with Request Count metrics is found in this
> handoff doc:
> [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lrz2wE5Dl4zlUfPAenjXIQyleZvqevqoxhyE85aj4sc/edit'|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lrz2wE5Dl4zlUfPAenjXIQyleZvqevqoxhyE85aj4sc/edit'?authuser=0]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
