[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355886#comment-17355886
]
Heejong Lee commented on BEAM-12440:
------------------------------------
Yes, container is there. We previously used beam-2.30.0 tag for legacy Java
containers but now only requires it for dev version. For releases, we're
expecting 2.30.0 tag without beam- prefix.
What's the tagging policy for the legacy Java container? Is it okay to just put
both beam-2.30.0 and 2.30.0 tags to the container or should we modify the
DataflowRunner code?
> Wrong version string for legacy Dataflow Java container
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-12440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12440
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: runner-dataflow
> Reporter: Heejong Lee
> Assignee: Emily Ye
> Priority: P1
> Fix For: 2.30.0
>
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2021-06-01 at 4.54.49 PM.png
>
>
> Dataflow runner looks for beam-java-batch:2.30.0 version for legacy Java
> container.
> The version string should be beam-2.30.0 instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
