[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3304?focusedWorklogId=632486&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-632486
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-3304:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 02/Aug/21 16:54
            Start Date: 02/Aug/21 16:54
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: lostluck commented on a change in pull request #15239:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15239#discussion_r681123176



##########
File path: sdks/go/pkg/beam/core/graph/edge.go
##########
@@ -527,8 +527,8 @@ func NewImpulse(g *Graph, s *Scope, value []byte) 
*MultiEdge {
 }
 
 // NewWindowInto inserts a new WindowInto edge into the graph.
-func NewWindowInto(g *Graph, s *Scope, wfn *window.Fn, in *Node) *MultiEdge {
-       n := g.NewNode(in.Type(), &window.WindowingStrategy{Fn: wfn}, 
in.Bounded())
+func NewWindowInto(g *Graph, s *Scope, wfn *window.Fn, tr window.TriggerType, 
in *Node) *MultiEdge {

Review comment:
       NewWindowInto should just change to take in a 
`*window.WindowingStrategy` instead of adding more and more parameters to it. 
There are other modes to handle in the future and by populating the windowing 
strategy in the Beam package before it gets here, will save time and effort 
when adding features later.

##########
File path: sdks/go/pkg/beam/windowing.go
##########
@@ -21,21 +21,47 @@ import (
        "github.com/apache/beam/sdks/go/pkg/beam/internal/errors"
 )
 
+type WindowIntoOption interface {
+       private()

Review comment:
       "private" isn't a good name for this blocking function, because 
beam.Option is already using it. You can test this out yourself by seeing that 
you can pass `WindowIntoOption`s as an Option into beam.ParDo.
   
   A better unexported method name would be `windowIntoOption()` to avoid this 
conflation.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 632486)
    Time Spent: 1h 10m  (was: 1h)

> Go triggering support
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-3304
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3304
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-go
>            Reporter: Henning Rohde
>            Assignee: Ritesh Ghorse
>            Priority: P3
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> `Add support for triggers.
> [https://beam.apache.org/documentation/programming-guide/#triggers] 
> Triggers are special runner side behavior indicating how to handle data WRT 
> the watermark and window. Commonly configuring the processing for “late data” 
> and similar.
> These are not currently implemented for user use in the Go SDK. Reshuffle 
> configures triggers, but it’s not accessible. A correct trigger 
> implementation can at least re-implement Reshuffle in a user pipeline, rather 
> than handled specially within the framework.
>  * Requires extending the window package to be able to configure the various 
> triggers.
>  * Specifically being able to compose triggers as also permitted by the proto.
>  ** 
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/6e7b1c44bc7275ee047afc059fd610cd3f4e5bee/model/pipeline/src/main/proto/beam_runner_api.proto#L1111]
>  
>  * Requires updating the graphx package translate.go to marshal (and 
> unmarshal?) the triggers to and from Beam PipelineProto Windowing strategies.
>  * Requires supporting triggers with the beam.WindowInto transform for user 
> pipeline use as well as complete documentation on its use from the user side.
>  ** 
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/6e7b1c44bc7275ee047afc059fd610cd3f4e5bee/sdks/go/pkg/beam/windowing.go]
>  
>  * Panes need to be decoded, otherwise triggering will cause runtime errors: 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r94c42d2d116f6464cd6b689543e5e578edf8310bf7c6e48a0958a56c%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E]
>  
>  * Handle pane propagation and observation in the exec package, and in user 
> dofns. 
>  ** Panes indicate whether data was on time or not, and similar facets which 
> may be relevant for processing.
>  ** Might simply extend the existing window interface.
>  
> Similar to windowing,  many of the same places as 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11100 need to be modified.
> At simplest though, it's mostly a runner side construction, with less concern 
> on the exec side, and generally much simpler. 
> Appropriate integration tests against portable runners must be implemented:
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/go/test/integration/primitives]
>  
> And optionally add support for the configurable triggers to the the Go Direct 
> Runner. However, the results must be compared and validated against a 
> semantically correct runner like the python portable runner first. At 
> minimum, the Go Direct Runner should be made aware of triggers and produce a 
> coherent error whenever there's a trigger it can't deal with.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to