[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16786151#comment-16786151
 ] 

Daniel Oliveira commented on BEAM-6327:
---------------------------------------

I don't see a problem with that, it sounds like a good idea. I probably won't 
be able to get to that any time soon, though. (I probably shouldn't even be 
assigned this bug, but I forgot about it). If you can handle that feel free to 
assign this bug to yourself.

> Don't attempt to fuse subtransforms of primitive/known transforms.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-6327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6327
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: runner-direct
>            Reporter: Robert Bradshaw
>            Assignee: Daniel Oliveira
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: triaged
>
> Currently we must remove all sub-components of any known transform that may 
> have an optional substructure, e.g. 
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/release-2.9.0/sdks/python/apache_beam/runners/portability/portable_runner.py#L126]
>  (for GBK) and [https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7360] (Reshuffle).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to