[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16793262#comment-16793262
]
Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-6840:
---------------------------------------
[~alanmyrvold] [~boyuanz] [~altay]
I realized this because of the failure, which has been going on for some time.
Our current precommit/postcommit testing setup means that this is expected to
fail sometimes. If we keep it green, and expand its testing, it could indicate
whether an existing container is good candidate for a Beam release.
> PostRelease failing on Dataflow due to java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> DoFnSignature$ProcessElementMethod.getRowParameter():
> DoFnSignature$Parameter$RowParameter
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-6840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6840
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: runner-dataflow
> Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
> Assignee: Reuven Lax
> Priority: Critical
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostRelease_NightlySnapshot/551/console
> {code}
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.reflect.DoFnSignature$ProcessElementMethod.getRowParameter()Lorg/apache/beam/sdk/transforms/reflect/DoFnSignature$Parameter$RowParameter;
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.repackaged.org.apache.beam.runners.core.SimpleDoFnRunner.<init>(SimpleDoFnRunner.java:175)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.repackaged.org.apache.beam.runners.core.DoFnRunners.simpleRunner(DoFnRunners.java:63)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.SimpleDoFnRunnerFactory.createRunner(SimpleDoFnRunnerFactory.java:52)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.SimpleParDoFn.reallyStartBundle(SimpleParDoFn.java:288)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.SimpleParDoFn.processElement(SimpleParDoFn.java:312)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ParDoOperation.process(ParDoOperation.java:44)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.OutputReceiver.process(OutputReceiver.java:49)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ReadOperation.runReadLoop(ReadOperation.java:201)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.ReadOperation.start(ReadOperation.java:159)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.util.common.worker.MapTaskExecutor.execute(MapTaskExecutor.java:76)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.executeWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:409)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.doWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:378)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.BatchDataflowWorker.getAndPerformWork(BatchDataflowWorker.java:306)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.doWork(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:135)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.call(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:115)
> 04:18:48 at
> org.apache.beam.runners.dataflow.worker.DataflowBatchWorkerHarness$WorkerThread.call(DataflowBatchWorkerHarness.java:102)
> 04:18:48 at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> 04:18:48 at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> 04:18:48 at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> 04:18:48 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> This means we need a new worker. The postrelease tests verify that the
> Dataflow worker image works when we _don't_ stage the worker jar.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
