[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-13073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Valentyn Tymofieiev reopened BEAM-13073:
----------------------------------------
> Unexpected GC when using Java 11
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-13073
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-13073
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: sdk-java-harness
> Reporter: Luis
> Assignee: Kenneth Knowles
> Priority: P2
> Labels: java11, java9, performance
> Fix For: 2.35.0
>
> Attachments: perf_regression_java_11.png
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Beam SDK has been supporting Java 11 for a while (I guess the support was
> introduced here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2530).
> Unfortunately, in Spotify we are still experiencing performance issues when
> using Beam SDK 2.32, Google Dataflow and Java 11.
> Thanks to [~emilyye] and [~iht], they confirmed JVM 11 is using SerialGC,
> while Java 8 uses ParallelGC. It sound like SerialGC a good option for high
> throughput / low latency jobs. For Java11 we'd expect to use G1GC or
> ParallelGC.
> This SO question [1] clarifies that JVM choses SerialGC when it treats the
> machine as a "client". It looks like the Java SDK container could benefit
> from using `-XX:+AlwaysActAsServerClassMachine`. Is that correct?
> Let me know if the ticket needs further context or adjustment. (It is my
> first time creating a ticket here).
> [1]
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52474162/why-is-serialgc-chosen-over-g1gc
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
