[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kenneth Knowles updated BEAM-1234:
----------------------------------
This Jira ticket has a pull request attached to it, but is still open. Did the
pull request resolve the issue? If so, could you please mark it resolved? This
will help the project have a clear view of its open issues.
> Consider a hint ParDo.withHighFanout()
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-1234
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1234
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: sdk-java-core
> Reporter: Eugene Kirpichov
> Priority: P3
> Labels: Clarified
>
> I'm finding myself again and again suggesting users on StackOverflow to
> insert fusion breaks after high-fanout ParDo's.
> I think we should just implement this as a hint on ParDo and MapElements
> transforms, like we have on GroupByKey.fewKeys() or
> Combine.withHotKeyFanout().
> E.g.: c.apply(ParDo.of(some high-fanout DoFn).withHighFanout()), and a runner
> that implements fusion could decide to insert a runner-specific fusion break.
> This somewhat sidesteps the issues in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-730 and
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ac34c9ac665a8d9f67b0254015e44c59ea65ecc1360d4014b95d3b2e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> because every runner can decide how to do the right thing, or is free to
> ignore the hint.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
