[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807313#comment-16807313
 ] 

Michael Luckey commented on BEAM-4046:
--------------------------------------

As Luke pointed out, we hit a confirmed gradle issue with duplicate project 
names here, see https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/847

{noformat}
container
dataflow
examples
fn-execution
java
jdbc
job-server
job-server-container
py3
{noformat}
Maybe one of the proposed workarounds is viable.

> Decouple gradle project names and maven artifact ids
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-4046
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4046
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: build-system
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Priority: Major
>
> In our first draft, we had gradle projects like {{":beam-sdks-java-core"}}. 
> It is clumsy and requires a hacky settings.gradle that is not idiomatic.
> In our second draft, we changed them to names that work well with Gradle, 
> like {{":sdks:java:core"}}. This caused Maven artifact IDs to be wonky.
> In our third draft, we regressed to the first draft to get the Maven artifact 
> ids right.
> These should be able to be decoupled. It seems there are many StackOverflow 
> questions on the subject.
> Since it is unidiomatic and a poor user experience, if it does turn out to be 
> mandatory then it needs to be documented inline everywhere - the 
> settings.gradle should say why it is so bizarre, and each build.gradle should 
> indicate what its project id is.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to