[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17486757#comment-17486757
]
Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-10652:
----------------------------------------
The code seems fine, but I don't really have the context around the BQ feature.
Is this a change to BQ since we first wrote the IO? Or is the main IO code
itself not safe to use in all these configurations?
> Allow Clustering without TimePartitioning in BigQueryIO
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-10652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-10652
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-gcp
> Affects Versions: 2.23.0
> Reporter: Brian Hulette
> Assignee: Bruce Arctor
> Priority: P3
> Time Spent: 18h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> [Clustering|https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/clustered-tables] without
> time partitioning is allowed in BigQuery, but we specifically reject it:
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/5e0e798ddd827fd212ac89b8c6f6f2cf9e4b29a5/sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/BigQueryIO.java#L2511-L2515
> We should remove this check and add tests for clustering without time
> partitioning.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
