[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3304?focusedWorklogId=738425&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-738425
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-3304:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 08/Mar/22 22:35
            Start Date: 08/Mar/22 22:35
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17047:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/17047#issuecomment-1062290029


   Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment 
`assign to next reviewer`:
   
   R: @damccorm for label go.
   
   Available commands:
   - `stop reviewer notifications` - opt out of the automated review tooling
   - `remind me after tests pass` - tag the comment author after tests pass
   - `waiting on author` - shift the attention set back to the author (any 
comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 738425)
    Time Spent: 16h  (was: 15h 50m)

> Go triggering support
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-3304
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3304
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-go
>            Reporter: Henning Rohde
>            Priority: P3
>          Time Spent: 16h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> `Add support for triggers.
> [https://beam.apache.org/documentation/programming-guide/#triggers] 
> Triggers are special runner side behavior indicating how to handle data WRT 
> the watermark and window. Commonly configuring the processing for “late data” 
> and similar.
> These are not currently implemented for user use in the Go SDK. Reshuffle 
> configures triggers, but it’s not accessible. A correct trigger 
> implementation can at least re-implement Reshuffle in a user pipeline, rather 
> than handled specially within the framework.
>  * Requires extending the window package to be able to configure the various 
> triggers.
>  * Specifically being able to compose triggers as also permitted by the proto.
>  ** 
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/6e7b1c44bc7275ee047afc059fd610cd3f4e5bee/model/pipeline/src/main/proto/beam_runner_api.proto#L1111]
>  
>  * Requires updating the graphx package translate.go to marshal (and 
> unmarshal?) the triggers to and from Beam PipelineProto Windowing strategies.
>  * Requires supporting triggers with the beam.WindowInto transform for user 
> pipeline use as well as complete documentation on its use from the user side.
>  ** 
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/6e7b1c44bc7275ee047afc059fd610cd3f4e5bee/sdks/go/pkg/beam/windowing.go]
>  
>  * Panes need to be decoded, otherwise triggering will cause runtime errors: 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r94c42d2d116f6464cd6b689543e5e578edf8310bf7c6e48a0958a56c%40%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E]
>  
>  * Handle pane propagation and observation in the exec package, and in user 
> dofns. 
>  ** Panes indicate whether data was on time or not, and similar facets which 
> may be relevant for processing.
>  ** Might simply extend the existing window interface.
>  
> Similar to windowing,  many of the same places as 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11100 need to be modified.
> At simplest though, it's mostly a runner side construction, with less concern 
> on the exec side, and generally much simpler. 
> Appropriate integration tests against portable runners must be implemented:
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/go/test/integration/primitives]
>  
> And optionally add support for the configurable triggers to the the Go Direct 
> Runner. However, the results must be compared and validated against a 
> semantically correct runner like the python portable runner first. At 
> minimum, the Go Direct Runner should be made aware of triggers and produce a 
> coherent error whenever there's a trigger it can't deal with.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to