[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14000?focusedWorklogId=766857&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-766857
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-14000:
-----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 05/May/22 18:55
            Start Date: 05/May/22 18:55
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: egalpin commented on PR #17297:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/17297#issuecomment-1118940186

   This PR has been blocked on me, apologies for the slow review cadence.  The 
next step would be to ideally find a way to write a test that "would have 
failed" with the code in master now, and would now pass as a result of 
@nishantjain91's great changes.  That way we can guard against regressions in 
the future.
   
   I haven't had time to dig into what options there might be for inspecting 
the resulting `RestClient` object (or the effect of the fix on generated 
requests via the `RestClient`, which might also be a sufficient test).




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 766857)
    Time Spent: 2h 40m  (was: 2.5h)

> Elastic search IO doesnot work when both username/password and keystore are 
> used
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-14000
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14000
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: nishant jain
>            Priority: P2
>          Time Spent: 2h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When using both username/password and ssl keystore, ElasticSearchIO doesnot 
> Create correct restclient.
>  
> Firstly, it sets HttpClientConfigCallback using httpAsyncClientBuilder if 
> username and passowrd is used. Afterwards, it will replace 
> HttpClientConfigCallback to httpClientBuilder is ssl store is used, hence 
> losing the credentials provider



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to