[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17550021#comment-17550021
 ] 

Danny McCormick commented on BEAM-14497:
----------------------------------------

This issue has been migrated to https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21591

> Python Reshuffle holds elements
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-14497
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-14497
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sdk-py-core
>            Reporter: Yi Hu
>            Priority: P2
>
> Python Reshuffle holds elements when pipeline is running, and likely release 
> them in a batch. In contrast, Java Reshuffle triggers on every element as 
> noted in its documentation 
> "the trigger used with {@link Reshuffle} which triggers on every element and 
> never buffers
>  * state."
> Here is a working example:
> {code:python}
> def test(p: Pipeline):
>   class SlowProcessFn(beam.DoFn):
>     def process(self, element):
>       time.sleep(0.5)
>       yield element
>   result = (p 
>     | beam.Create(range(100)) 
>     | beam.ParDo(SlowProcessFn())
>     | beam.Reshuffle() # HERE
>     | beam.Map(lambda x: print(x, time.time())))
>   return result
> {code}
> Tested on local runner and flink runner (1.14), the elements are printed 
> after 50 secs. If commenting out Reshuffle, every half second an element gets 
> printed.
> This behavior introduces issue when downstream PTransform involves some kind 
> of time-sensitive operation, like receiving a list of updated files from 
> input and read them done by filebasedsource.ReadAllFiles transform. Because 
> there is a Reshuffle in ReadAll, the actual read will be blocked.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to