[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ismaël Mejía reassigned BEAM-7413:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Peter Backx

> Huge amount of tasks per stage in Spark runner after upgrade to Beam 2.12.0
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-7413
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7413
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: runner-spark
>    Affects Versions: 2.12.0
>            Reporter: Peter Backx
>            Assignee: Peter Backx
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.14.0
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> After upgrading from Beam 2.8.0 to 2.12.0 we see a huge number of tasks per 
> stage in our pipelines. Where we used to see a few thousands tasks/stage at 
> most, it's now into the millions. This makes the pipeline unable to complete 
> successfully (driver and network are overloaded)
> It looks like after each (Co)GroupByKey operation, the amount of tasks (per 
> stage) at least doubles sometimes even more.
> I did notice a fix to GroupByKey (BEAM-5392) that may or may not be related.
> I cannot post the full pipeline, but we have created a small test to showcase 
> the effect:
> [https://github.com/pbackx/beam-groupbykey-test]
>  
> [https://github.com/pbackx/beam-groupbykey-test/blob/master/src/test/java/NumTaskTest.java]
>  contains two tests:
>  * One shows how we would usually join PCollections together and if you run 
> it, you'll see the number of tasks gradually increase
>  * The other uses a GroupIntoBatches operation after each join. The effect is 
> that there's no longer an increase in tasks. (the deprecated Reshuffle 
> operation has a similar effect, but it's deprecated...)
> We've now sprinkled GroupIntoBatches throughout our pipeline and this seems 
> to avoid the issue, but at the cost of performance (this effect is much worse 
> in the toy example than in our "real" pipeline to be honest). 
> My questions:
>  * Is this a bug or is this expected behavior?
>  * Is the GroupIntoBatches the best workaround or are there better options?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to