[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ismaël Mejía updated BEAM-7556:
-------------------------------
Status: Open (was: Triage Needed)
> Enable to upgrade proxy generation independently of beam for java support
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-7556
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7556
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: sdk-java-core
> Affects Versions: 2.13.0
> Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
> Priority: Major
>
> Beam is now using a custom shaded version of bytebudy which makes impossible
> - until you reshade - to upgrade bytebuddy without requiring a new beam
> release.
> However with the fast release rate of the JVM it is important to be able to
> upgrade bytebuddy - at least while beam is using it which is technically not
> a strong requirement - to enable to run on the new JVM.
> For example, last beam release does not support recent java:
> {code}
> Caused by: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Cannot define class using
> reflection: Cannot define nest member class
> java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject$Cache + within different package then
> class
> org.apache.beam.repackaged.beam_sdks_java_core.net.bytebuddy.mirror.AccessibleObject
> {code}
> My preference to fix this issue would be to relax the proxying definition to
> just use a "proxy classloader" where the proxy would be defined but it
> requires to be able to attach it to an execution - where beam is not yet
> super clean.
> Alternative is to have a SPI for the asm usage and enable to user to replace
> the bytebuddy impl with either a not shaded version or even a pure asm one to
> let him control the dependencies.
> Romain
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
