[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7837?focusedWorklogId=285025&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-285025
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-7837:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 30/Jul/19 15:09
            Start Date: 30/Jul/19 15:09
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: iemejia commented on issue #9191: [BEAM-7837] Add 
adapter class for API incompatible changes in Spark 3
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9191#issuecomment-516462175
 
 
   Run Java PreCommit
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 285025)
    Time Spent: 1h 20m  (was: 1h 10m)

> Add an adapter class to support changes in Spark 3 API
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-7837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7837
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: runner-spark
>            Reporter: Ismaël Mejía
>            Assignee: Ismaël Mejía
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As part of the API clean ups of Spark 3, there are some methods that do not 
> work as before. For details.
> SPARK-19287 JavaPairRDD flatMapValues requires function returning Iterable, 
> not Iterator
> SPARK-25737 Remove JavaSparkContextVarargsWorkaround and standardize union() 
> methods
> If we want to support both Spark 2 and Spark 3 with the same runner code base 
> we should probably create an adapter class for API incompatible code between 
> Spark versions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to