[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8241?focusedWorklogId=313241&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-313241
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-8241:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 16/Sep/19 18:37
            Start Date: 16/Sep/19 18:37
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: apilloud commented on issue #9586: [BEAM-8241] SQL code 
gen is more restrictive than Calcite
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9586#issuecomment-531903206
 
 
   R: @kanterov You were the original author of this assert in #9119. It looks 
like it was just intended to guard the for loop and it still does that. Just 
wanted to make sure there wasn't something deeper that I am missing. 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 313241)
    Time Spent: 0.5h  (was: 20m)

> BEAM SQL code gen is more restrictive than Calcite
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-8241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8241
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dsl-sql
>    Affects Versions: 2.15.0
>            Reporter: Kirill Kozlov
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In user defined functions Calcite allows variants with fewer arguments than 
> Beam defined.
> Calcite, when generating code for functions with less arguments than defined 
> will generate a proper function call.
> Some scalar functions, like concat, take advantage of this feature. Thus, 
> requiring more permissive checks in translate.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

Reply via email to