[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16958069#comment-16958069
 ] 

Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-8393:
---------------------------------------

The wording of Jira's priorities is unfortunate. By setting Fix Version it is 
already declared to be a release blocker, regardless of priority. I just think 
of them as P0-P4, where P0 means someone should probably get paged (like if all 
tests are failing, blocking the community).

> Java BigQueryIO clustering support breaks on multiple partitions
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-8393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8393
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-java-gcp
>    Affects Versions: 2.15.0, 2.16.0
>            Reporter: Jeff Klukas
>            Assignee: Jeff Klukas
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.17.0
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Support for writing to clustered tables in BigQuery was added in 2.15, which 
> involved adding a new optional clustering field to TableDestination. 
> Clustering support is working for most cases, but fails with errors about 
> incompatible partitioning specifications for any data that is handled by the 
> MultiplePartitions branch of BigQueryIO logic.
> There is a case in that code path where we provide a modified 
> TableDestination and neglect to copy the clustering definition, so the final 
> load job does not include any clustering columns.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to