[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8347?focusedWorklogId=337493&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-337493
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-8347:
----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 01/Nov/19 19:15
Start Date: 01/Nov/19 19:15
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: jkff commented on issue #9820: [BEAM-8347]:
Consistently advance UnboundedRabbitMqReader watermark
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9820#issuecomment-548916891
@drobert I totally agree that it makes sense to do a stop-the-bleeding fix
first. Watermark logic in unbounded sources that don't have good native
watermarks has been an issue for a very long time; if one were to attack this
problem in a generic way, it would be best to start with a design and discuss
it on dev@ - certainly outside the scope of this PR.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 337493)
Time Spent: 2.5h (was: 2h 20m)
> UnboundedRabbitMqReader can fail to advance watermark if no new data comes in
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-8347
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8347
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: io-java-rabbitmq
> Affects Versions: 2.15.0
> Environment: testing has been done using the DirectRunner. I also
> have DataflowRunner available
> Reporter: Daniel Robert
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 2.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I stumbled upon this and then saw a similar StackOverflow post:
> [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55736593/apache-beam-rabbitmqio-watermark-doesnt-advance]
> When calling `advance()` if there are no messages, no state changes,
> including no changes to the CheckpointMark or Watermark. If there is a
> relatively constant rate of new messages coming in, this is not a problem. If
> data is bursty, and there are periods of no new messages coming in, the
> watermark will never advance.
> Contrast this with some of the logic in PubsubIO which will make provisions
> for periods of inactivity to advance the watermark (although it, too, is
> imperfect: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7322 )
> The example given in the StackOverflow post is something like this:
>
> {code:java}
> pipeline
> .apply(RabbitMqIO.read()
> .withUri("amqp://guest:guest@localhost:5672")
> .withQueue("test")
> .apply("Windowing",
> Window.<RabbitMqMessage>into(
> FixedWindows.of(Duration.standardSeconds(10)))
> .triggering(AfterWatermark.pastEndOfWindow())
> .withAllowedLateness(Duration.ZERO)
> .accumulatingFiredPanes()){code}
> If I push 2 messages into my rabbit queue, I see 2 unack'd messages and a
> window that never performs an on time trigger.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
