Tomo Suzuki created BEAM-8747:
---------------------------------
Summary: Remove Unused non-vendored Guava compile dependencies
Key: BEAM-8747
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8747
Project: Beam
Issue Type: Bug
Components: build-system
Reporter: Tomo Suzuki
Assignee: Tomo Suzuki
[~kenn] says:
BeamModulePlugin just contains lists of versions to ease coordination across
Beam modules, but mostly does not create dependencies. Most of Beam's modules
only depend on a few things there. For example Guava is not a core dependency,
but here is where it is actually depended upon:
$ find . -name build.gradle | xargs grep library.java.guava
./sdks/java/core/build.gradle: shadowTest library.java.guava_testlib
./sdks/java/extensions/sql/jdbc/build.gradle: compile library.java.guava
./sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/build.gradle: compile library.java.guava
./sdks/java/io/kinesis/build.gradle: testCompile library.java.guava_testlib
These results appear to be misleading. Grepping for 'import com.google.common',
I see this as the actual state of things:
- GCP connector does not appear to actually depend on Guava in compile scope
- The Beam SQL JDBC driver does not appear to actually depend on Guava in
compile scope
- The Dataflow Java worker does depend on Guava at compile scope but has
incorrect dependencies (and it probably shouldn't)
- KinesisIO does depend on Guava at compile scope but has incorrect
dependencies (Kinesis libs have Guava on API surface so it is OK here, but
should be correctly declared)
- ZetaSQL translator does depend on Guava at compile scope but has incorrect
dependencies (ZetaSQL has it on API surface so it is OK here, but should be
correctly declared)
We used to have an analysis that prevented this class of error.
Once the errors are fixed, the guava_version is simply a version that we have
discovered that seems to work for both Kinesis and ZetaSQL, libraries we do not
control. Kinesis producer is built against 18.0. Kinesis client against
26.0-jre. ZetaSQL against 26.0-android.
(or maybe I messed up in my analysis)
Kenn
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)