[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9008?focusedWorklogId=379781&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-379781
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9008:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 31/Jan/20 07:33
            Start Date: 31/Jan/20 07:33
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: vmarquez commented on issue #10546: [BEAM-9008] Add 
CassandraIO readAll method
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10546#issuecomment-580619044
 
 
   @iemejia I have started working on a different implementation of ReadAll 
that extends `PTransform<PCollection<Read<T>>, PCollection<T>>`, however, I 
have thought about it more and I am thinking that it is bad more undesireable 
than we thought to *not* establish a connection in `setup` of the `ReadFn` 
class.  Just this week at work I had to do some work involving generating 
hundreds of thousands of queries (`RingRanges`), and the vast majority of them 
returned no or almost no data!  The data was sparse and never the less I still 
needed to perform the queries, so having to establish a new connection per 
`RingRange` in the `processElement` method would have slown things down a lot.  
   
   I understand the desire to have simpler code, but I think the performance 
impact would be noticable if we only keep connection information in the 
`Read<T>` that comes into the `processElement` method.   Do you still want to 
proceed with that? 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 379781)
    Time Spent: 4.5h  (was: 4h 20m)

> Add readAll() method to CassandraIO
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9008
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9008
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: io-java-cassandra
>    Affects Versions: 2.16.0
>            Reporter: vincent marquez
>            Assignee: vincent marquez
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 4.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When querying a large cassandra database, it's often *much* more useful to 
> programatically generate the queries needed to to be run rather than reading 
> all partitions and attempting some filtering.  
> As an example:
> {code:java}
> public class Event { 
>    @PartitionKey(0) public UUID accountId;
>    @PartitionKey(1)public String yearMonthDay; 
>    @ClusteringKey public UUID eventId;  
>    //other data...
> }{code}
> If there is ten years worth of data, you may want to only query one year's 
> worth.  Here each token range would represent one 'token' but all events for 
> the day. 
> {code:java}
> Set<UUID> accounts = getRelevantAccounts();
> Set<String> dateRange = generateDateRange("2018-01-01", "2019-01-01");
> PCollection<TokenRange> tokens = generateTokens(accounts, dateRange); 
> {code}
>  
>  I propose an additional _readAll()_ PTransform that can take a PCollection 
> of token ranges and can return a PCollection<T> of what the query would 
> return. 
> *Question: How much code should be in common between both methods?* 
> Currently the read connector already groups all partitions into a List of 
> Token Ranges, so it would be simple to refactor the current read() based 
> method to a 'ParDo' based one and have them both share the same function.  
> Reasons against sharing code between read and readAll
>  * Not having the read based method return a BoundedSource connector would 
> mean losing the ability to know the size of the data returned
>  * Currently the CassandraReader executes all the grouped TokenRange queries 
> *asynchronously* which is (maybe?) fine when all that's happening is 
> splitting up all the partition ranges but terrible for executing potentially 
> millions of queries. 
>  Reasons _for_ sharing code would be simplified code base and that both of 
> the above issues would most likely have a negligable performance impact. 
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to