[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ismaël Mejía updated BEAM-9252:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
I was checking today a pipeline against the latest 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT and I found 
that it used to work perfectly and now is failing to shade with an exception 
that refers to grpc 1.26.0

{{[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin:3.2.1:shade (default) on project 
EventsToIOs: Error creating shaded jar: Problem shading JAR 
/home/ismael/.m2/repository/org/apache/beam/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0/0.1/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0-0.1.jar
 entry org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p26p0/org/jboss/modules/Main.class: 
org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error in ASM processing class 
org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p26p0/org/jboss/modules/Main.class: 65536 -> 
[Help 1]}}

{{There is also a warning that is not present in the build against 2.19.0}}

{{[WARNING] Discovered module-info.class. Shading will break its strong 
encapsulation.}}

 

I wonder if we are not doing something wrong during our vendoring, can someone 
take a look please.

This is relatively easy to reproduce with the beam-samples repo

https://github.com/jbonofre/beam-samples/runs/427537544?check_suite_focus=true

 

  was:
I was checking today a pipeline against the latest 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT and I found 
that it used to work perfectly and now is failing to shade with an exception 
that refers to grpc 1.26.0

{{[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin:3.2.1:shade (default) on project 
EventsToIOs: Error creating shaded jar: Problem shading JAR 
/home/ismael/.m2/repository/org/apache/beam/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0/0.1/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0-0.1.jar
 entry org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p26p0/org/jboss/modules/Main.class: 
org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error in ASM processing class 
org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p26p0/org/jboss/modules/Main.class: 65536 -> 
[Help 1]}}

{{There is also a warning that is not present in the build against 2.19.0}}

{{[WARNING] Discovered module-info.class. Shading will break its strong 
encapsulation.}}

 

I wonder if we are not doing something wrong during our vendoring, can someone 
take a look please.

This is relatively easy to reproduce with the beam-samples repo

[https://github.com/jbonofre/beam-samples/actions/runs/35054520/workflow]

 


> Problem shading Beam pipeline with Beam 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9252
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9252
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: build-system
>    Affects Versions: 2.20.0
>            Reporter: Ismaël Mejía
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.20.0
>
>
> I was checking today a pipeline against the latest 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT and I 
> found that it used to work perfectly and now is failing to shade with an 
> exception that refers to grpc 1.26.0
> {{[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin:3.2.1:shade (default) on project 
> EventsToIOs: Error creating shaded jar: Problem shading JAR 
> /home/ismael/.m2/repository/org/apache/beam/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0/0.1/beam-vendor-grpc-1_26_0-0.1.jar
>  entry org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p26p0/org/jboss/modules/Main.class: 
> org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error in ASM processing class 
> org/apache/beam/vendor/grpc/v1p26p0/org/jboss/modules/Main.class: 65536 -> 
> [Help 1]}}
> {{There is also a warning that is not present in the build against 2.19.0}}
> {{[WARNING] Discovered module-info.class. Shading will break its strong 
> encapsulation.}}
>  
> I wonder if we are not doing something wrong during our vendoring, can 
> someone take a look please.
> This is relatively easy to reproduce with the beam-samples repo
> https://github.com/jbonofre/beam-samples/runs/427537544?check_suite_focus=true
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to