[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9231?focusedWorklogId=383530&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-383530
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on BEAM-9231:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 07/Feb/20 13:07
            Start Date: 07/Feb/20 13:07
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: iemejia commented on issue #10739: [BEAM-9231] Annotate 
as Experimental/Internal missing classes in beam-sdks-java-core
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10739#issuecomment-583333086
 
 
   retest this please
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 383530)
    Time Spent: 6h 10m  (was: 6h)

> Annotate as Experimental/Internal missing classes in beam-sdks-java-core
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9231
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9231
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sdk-java-core
>            Reporter: Ismaël Mejía
>            Assignee: Ismaël Mejía
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: portability
>          Time Spent: 6h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> For some extra context I was studying the evolution of our APIs between 
> versions in particular for beam-sdks-java-core and noticed that some parts 
> were not well classified as Experimental in particular classes (and 
> transforms)  for portability and SplittableDoFn.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to