[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17034131#comment-17034131
]
Esun Kim commented on BEAM-9288:
--------------------------------
Gcsio starts depending on gRPC along with conscrypt and we're considering if
it's feasible to shade it in gcsio. Since Conscrypt is not ready for being
shaded, however, shading isn't considered as an option for now. I think it
shouldn't shade it until Conscrypt becomes fully aware of shading.
> Conscrypt shaded dependency
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-9288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build-system
> Reporter: Esun Kim
> Assignee: sunjincheng
> Priority: Major
>
> Conscrypt is not designed to be shaded properly mainly because of so files. I
> happened to see BEAM-9030 (*1) creating a new vendored gRPC shading Conscrypt
> (*2) in it. I think this could make a problem when new Conscrypt is brought
> by new gcsio depending on gRPC-alts (*4) in a dependency chain. (*5) In this
> case, it may have a conflict when finding proper so files for Conscrypt.
> *1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9030
> *2:
> [https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/e24d1e51cbabe27cb3cc381fd95b334db639c45d/buildSrc/src/main/groovy/org/apache/beam/gradle/GrpcVendoring_1_26_0.groovy#L78]
> *3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6136
> *4: [https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/io.grpc/grpc-alts/1.27.0]
> *5: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8889
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
