[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17071688#comment-17071688
 ] 

Alexey Romanenko commented on BEAM-9439:
----------------------------------------

[~titmus] Thanks, sounds good to me as a trade-off solution. Perhaps we can 
have an +optional+ {{getSplitBacklogBytes()}} implementation based on Enhanced 
Shard-level Metrics, as Pawel suggested, but I think it will a different Jira 
for that.
I'll assign this Jira to you if you mind, feel free to reassign it to 
[~m.juraszek]. And I'll be happy to review a PR once it will be ready.

> KinesisReader does not report correct backlog statistics 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-9439
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9439
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-java-kinesis
>            Reporter: Sam Whittle
>            Priority: Major
>
> The KinesisReader implementing KinesisIO reports backlog by implementing the
> UnboundedSource.getTotalBacklogBytes()
> method as opposed to the
> UnboundedSource.getSplitBacklogBytes()
> This value is supposed to represent the total backlog across all shards.  
> This function is implemented by calling 
> SimplifiedKinesisClient.getBacklogBytes with the watermark of the kinesis 
> shards managed within the UnboundedReader instance.  As this watermark may be 
> further ahead than the watermark across all shards, this may miss backlog 
> bytes.
> An additional concern is that the watermark is calculated using a 
> WatermarkPolicy, which means that the watermark may be inconsistent to the 
> kinesis timestamp for querying backlog.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to