[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17132508#comment-17132508
]
Beam JIRA Bot commented on BEAM-676:
------------------------------------
This issue is assigned but has not received an update in 30 days so it has been
labeled "stale-assigned". If you are still working on the issue, please give an
update and remove the label. If you are no longer working on the issue, please
unassign so someone else may work on it. In 7 days the issue will be
automatically unassigned.
> Use a provider to create JMS ConnectionFactory and avoid Serialization issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-jms
> Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Assignee: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Priority: P2
> Labels: stale-assigned
>
> The {{JmsIO}} uses JMS {{ConnectionFactory}} as configuration. Unfortunately,
> {{ConnectionFactory}} interface doesn't extend {{Serializable}} (even if most
> of the implementations are {{Serializable}}).
> Instead (as I'm doing for the {{JdbcIO}}), I propose to create a
> {{ConnectionFactoryConfiguration}} POJO to create the {{ConnectionFactory}}
> in the {{@Setup}} of the reader and writer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
