[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17138647#comment-17138647
 ] 

Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-91:
-------------------------------------

Workarounds might be sufficient in some cases. It means all DSLs like SQL that 
have clear and strict semantics will have to re-implement retractions at the 
"user" level.

> Retractions
> -----------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-91
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-91
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: beam-model
>            Reporter: Tyler Akidau
>            Priority: P2
>              Labels: stale-P2
>   Original Estimate: 672h
>  Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> We still haven't added retractions to Beam, even though they're a core part 
> of the model. We should document all the necessary aspects (uncombine, 
> reverting DoFn output with DoOvers, sink integration, source-level 
> retractions, etc), and then implement them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to