[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17139849#comment-17139849
 ] 

Beam JIRA Bot commented on BEAM-676:
------------------------------------

This issue was marked "stale-assigned" and has not received a public comment in 
7 days. It is now automatically unassigned. If you are still working on it, you 
can assign it to yourself again. Please also give an update about the status of 
the work.

> Use a provider to create JMS ConnectionFactory and avoid Serialization issues
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-676
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-676
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io-java-jms
>            Reporter: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>            Priority: P2
>
> The {{JmsIO}} uses JMS {{ConnectionFactory}} as configuration. Unfortunately, 
> {{ConnectionFactory}} interface doesn't extend {{Serializable}} (even if most 
> of the implementations are {{Serializable}}).
> Instead (as I'm doing for the {{JdbcIO}}), I propose to create a 
> {{ConnectionFactoryConfiguration}} POJO to create the {{ConnectionFactory}} 
> in the {{@Setup}} of the reader and writer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to