sijie commented on a change in pull request #1117: BP-29: Metadata API module URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1117#discussion_r166044263
########## File path: site/bps/BP-29-metadata-store-api-module.md ########## @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +--- +title: "BP-29: Metadata API module" +issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/<issue-number> +state: 'Under Discussion' +release: "x.y.z" +--- + +### Motivation + +We have already abstracted all the metadata operations into interfaces. And all the bookkeeper implementations only reply on metadata interfaces, +rather than depending on zookeeper. This proposal is to organize the metadata interfaces and its implementations in a separate module and make +bookkeeper implementation only depends on metadata interfaces, not depends on zookeeper. This would a few benefits: + +- It allows supporting different metadata storages, without bringing in dependencies of metadata store implementation directly into + bookkeeper-server module. The development of different metadata storage can be done without interleaving with each other. +- It would define a clean module dependency between bookkeeper implementation and metadata api, and how bookkeeper load a different metadata Review comment: @jvrao does this make sense to you? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
