ivankelly opened a new pull request #2099: [DLOG] Delete empty inprogress 
segment on recovery
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2099
 
 
   This addresses an issue, whereby if a user is using getLastTxId() to
   find the first txnid when starting to write, they will continue to be
   able to write if the last segment written by the previous writer was
   empty. If the last segment was empty, then the maxTxId would be higher
   than the result of getLastTxId(). maxTxId is read from a znode, while
   getLastTxId() reads the txid of the last persisted record. In the case
   of an empty inprogress segment, the maxTxId znode was being updated
   with the expected first transaction id of the segment.
   
   This patch addresses the issue with the following changes:
   1. The maxTxId znode is only updated when inprogress segment is
      completed, so it's value always refers to a transaction that
      exists.
   2. On recovery, if the inprogress segment is empty, delete it. There
      was a TODO comment to do this already there.
   3. When generating the sequence number, allow a potential sequence
      number which is equal to the current max sequence number, as this
      can be the case where recovery deleted an inprogress empty segment.
   
   Descriptions of the changes in this PR:
   
   
   
   ### Motivation
   
   (Explain: why you're making that change, what is the problem you're trying 
to solve)
   
   ### Changes
   
   (Describe: what changes you have made)
   
   Master Issue: #<master-issue-number>
   
   > ---
   > In order to uphold a high standard for quality for code contributions, 
Apache BookKeeper runs various precommit
   > checks for pull requests. A pull request can only be merged when it passes 
precommit checks. However running all
   > the precommit checks can take a long time, some trivial changes don't need 
to run all the precommit checks. You
   > can check following list to skip the tests that don't need to run for your 
pull request. Leave them unchecked if
   > you are not sure, committers will help you:
   >
   > - [ ] [skip bookkeeper-server bookie tests]: skip testing 
`org.apache.bookkeeper.bookie` in bookkeeper-server module.
   > - [ ] [skip bookkeeper-server client tests]: skip testing 
`org.apache.bookkeeper.client` in bookkeeper-server module.
   > - [ ] [skip bookkeeper-server replication tests]: skip testing 
`org.apache.bookkeeper.replication` in bookkeeper-server module.
   > - [ ] [skip bookkeeper-server tls tests]: skip testing 
`org.apache.bookkeeper.tls` in bookkeeper-server module.
   > - [ ] [skip bookkeeper-server remaining tests]: skip testing all other 
tests in bookkeeper-server module.
   > - [ ] [skip integration tests]: skip docker based integration tests. if 
you make java code changes, you shouldn't skip integration tests.
   > - [ ] [skip build java8]: skip build on java8. *ONLY* skip this when 
*ONLY* changing files under documentation under `site`.
   > - [ ] [skip build java11]: skip build on java11. *ONLY* skip this when 
*ONLY* changing files under documentation under `site`.
   > ---
   
   > ---
   > Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
   > quickly and easily:
   >
   > If this PR is a BookKeeper Proposal (BP):
   >
   > - [ ] Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
   >     `<BP-#>: Description of bookkeeper proposal`
   >     `e.g. BP-1: 64 bits ledger is support`
   > - [ ] Attach the master issue link in the description of this PR.
   > - [ ] Attach the google doc link if the BP is written in Google Doc.
   >
   > Otherwise:
   > 
   > - [ ] Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
   >     `<Issue #>: Description of pull request`
   >     `e.g. Issue 123: Description ...`
   > - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `mvn clean apache-rat:check install 
spotbugs:check`.
   > - [ ] Replace `<Issue #>` in the title with the actual Issue number.
   > 
   > ---
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to