reddycharan commented on a change in pull request #2186: Fix logic of 
areEntriesOfLedgerStoredInTheBookie
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2186#discussion_r338329678
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
bookkeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/client/BookKeeperAdminTest.java
 ##########
 @@ -575,4 +576,38 @@ public void 
testGetListOfEntriesOfLedgerWithEntriesNotStripedToABookie() throws
         bkAdmin.close();
         bkc.close();
     }
+
+    @Test
+    public void testAreEntriesOfLedgerStoredInTheBookieForMultipleSegments() 
throws Exception {
+        int lastEntryId = 10;
+        long ledgerId = 100L;
+        BookieSocketAddress bookie0 = new BookieSocketAddress("bookie0:3181");
+        BookieSocketAddress bookie1 = new BookieSocketAddress("bookie1:3181");
+        BookieSocketAddress bookie2 = new BookieSocketAddress("bookie2:3181");
+        BookieSocketAddress bookie3 = new BookieSocketAddress("bookie3:3181");
+
+        List<BookieSocketAddress> ensembleOfSegment1 = new 
ArrayList<BookieSocketAddress>();
+        ensembleOfSegment1.add(bookie0);
+        ensembleOfSegment1.add(bookie1);
+        ensembleOfSegment1.add(bookie2);
+
+        List<BookieSocketAddress> ensembleOfSegment2 = new 
ArrayList<BookieSocketAddress>();
+        ensembleOfSegment2.add(bookie3);
+        ensembleOfSegment2.add(bookie1);
+        ensembleOfSegment2.add(bookie2);
+
+        LedgerMetadataBuilder builder = LedgerMetadataBuilder.create();
+        builder.withEnsembleSize(3)
+                .withWriteQuorumSize(3)
+                .withAckQuorumSize(2)
+                .withDigestType(digestType.toApiDigestType())
+                .withPassword(PASSWORD.getBytes())
+                .newEnsembleEntry(0, ensembleOfSegment1)
+                .newEnsembleEntry(lastEntryId + 1, ensembleOfSegment2)
+                
.withLastEntryId(lastEntryId).withLength(65576).withClosedState();
+        LedgerMetadata meta = builder.build();
+
+        assertFalse("expected areEntriesOfLedgerStoredInTheBookie to return 
False",
 
 Review comment:
   @eolivelli added one more assertTrue case here. 
   
   Actually here I'm not adding new logic but just fixing the existing issue. 
Thats why i created a testcase to repro it. Anyhow the new positive check 
(assertTrue) should be good for what you asked for.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to