Shoothzj commented on pull request #2859: URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2859#issuecomment-961698189
> Thanks for your contribution. Usually I lean towards to not accept PRs tlike this one. It is not fixing any real problem. The boxing operation that you are saving is not on an hot path. > > The patch would malke more sense of you try to take a look to all the useless boxing operations and make a general clean up > > WDYT? That's more worthful. I will use some tools to check it. I just view at this, and change this line. From the machine view, it's not fixing any real problem. But from people view, it can make code more clean, more easier to read. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
