kezhuw commented on a change in pull request #2944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2944#discussion_r770397152
##########
File path:
bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/FileInfo.java
##########
@@ -549,6 +549,7 @@ public synchronized void moveToNewLocation(File newFile,
long size) throws IOExc
}
fc = new RandomAccessFile(newFile, mode).getChannel();
lf = newFile;
+ deleted = false;
Review comment:
Seems that all access methods of `deleted` and `fc` are `synchronized`.
So I think it is safe ?
Actually, I could keep `deleted` untouched by using `lf.delete()` directly
to delete file instead of `FileInfo.delete` which is used as spying point to
mimic crashing behavior in tests. But, this way I have to introduce an extra
spying point to intercept. Should I go this way and make spying point more
explicitly ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
